“There is not any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any in the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after some distance they noticed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not indicate that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This sort of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of last witnessed.

While the punishment could be severe, its purpose isn't solely to seek vengeance but to discourage likely offenders and copyright the principles of justice and social order.

4.       Record shows that the petitioner has become booked in as much as 8 criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the instant case. Despite the fact that the petitioner has obtained bail in those cases, it does, prima facie, set up that the petitioner is at risk of repeating the offence.

Although there isn't any prohibition against referring to case regulation from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds tiny sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent from the home state, relevant case regulation from another state might be deemed from the court.

R.O, Office, Gujranwala along with the police officials didn't inform him that the identification parade on the accused has not been conducted yet. In the instant case, now the accused attempted to consider advantage of This system aired by SAMAA News, wherein the picture of the petitioner was extensively circulated. The police should not have uncovered the identity on the accused through electronic media. The regulation lends assurance on the accused that the identity should not be exposed to the witnesses, particularly to the witness to determine the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer put a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and developed shots. Aside from, the images shown over the media reveal that a mask was not placed over the accused to hide his identity right until he was put up for an identification parade. Making pictures in the accused publically, either by showing the same to your witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or program, would create doubt within the proceedings on the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to be sure that there isn't any probability to the witness to begin to see the accused before going on the identification parade. The accused should not be shown to the witness in person or through any other mode, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or the push or electronic media. Supplied the reasons elaborated previously mentioned, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C.

four.       It goes without stating that observations made hereinabove are only tentative in nature and strictly confined to your disposal of immediate bail petition.

The ruling on the first court created case legislation that must be accompanied by other courts until or unless either new law is created, or even a higher court rules differently.

whether when granting promotion senior employees were deemed for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)

department concerned shall present the complete list of ACRs in the concerned officer to DPC perfectly in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)

Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, as well as case regulation at both the federal and state levels.

Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and stability. It demonstrates the commitment of your state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of legislation.

PACER allows any person with an account to search here and locate appellate, district, and bankruptcy court case and docket information. Register for the PACER account.

In order to preserve a uniform enforcement of your laws, the legal system adheres on the doctrine of stare decisis

The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to determine a commission of internationally known and acknowledged experts to review and rule on future grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power traces.